Christopher Heyman vs Mateusz Terczynski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Heyman vs M. Terczynski

Christopher Heyman

BEL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

812

C. Rank

258

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Mateusz Terczynski

POL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

812

C. Rank

258

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Heyman 1 - 0 Terczynski

They have played 2 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 2 and Mateusz Terczynski winning 0. The last match between Christopher Heyman and Mateusz Terczynski was at the Belgium F8 (Eupen), 09-08-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-1 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Heyman	1
Terczynski	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Belgium F8 (Eupen)(08-09-17)

Stats

Christopher Heyman

Mateusz Terczynski

C. Heyman vs M. Terczynski H2H Profile

C. Heyman	Stats	M. Terczynski
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
63.65% (352-201)	Career Total W/L	43.18% (114-150)
1	Clay	0
19	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Heyman vs M. Terczynski Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Christopher Heyman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mateusz Terczynski has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Christopher Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mateusz Terczynski has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Christopher Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mateusz Terczynski has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Christopher Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mateusz Terczynski winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Christopher Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/31). Mateusz Terczynski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 63/74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Christopher Heyman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mateusz Terczynski has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Christopher Heyman winning 1 times and Mateusz Terczynski being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 2 and Mateusz Terczynski winning 0.
The last match between Christopher Heyman and Mateusz Terczynski was at the Belgium F8 (Eupen), 09-08-2017, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-1 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Christopher Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mateusz Terczynski has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Christopher Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mateusz Terczynski has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Christopher Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mateusz Terczynski has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Christopher Heyman vs Mateusz Terczynski Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Heyman vs M. Terczynski H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Heyman	Stats	M. Terczynski
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	2
2	Aces (Total)	1
1	Total Double Faults	1
1:18:0	Average Match Time	1:18:0
69% (31/45)	1st Serve %	69% (43/62)
71% (22/31)	1st Serve Win %	42% (18/43)
71% (10/14)	2nd Serve Win %	53% (10/19)
63% (5/8)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/4)
55% (34/62)	Return Points Win %	29% (13/45)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Heyman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Challenger - 23-01-2023
Q1 Tibo ColsonT. Colson	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Lodz - 25-07-2022
R2 Kristjan TammK. Tamm	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Adrien GobatA. Gobat	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
M25 Marburg - 04-07-2022
R2 Sidane PontjodikromoS. Pontjodikromo	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
R1 Philip SekulicP. Sekulic	W	4-1 ret.	Stats

View All

M. Terczynski Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Lodz - 08-07-2024
Q3 Martins RocensM. Rocens	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Q2 Marcin DojczynskiM. Dojczynski	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Mateusz CisloM. Cislo	W	6-0 6-2	Stats
M15 Koszalin - 04-09-2023
R2 Maciej RajskiM. Rajski	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
R1 Mikolaj LisM. Lis	W	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

C. Heyman vs M. Terczynski Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Heyman	Stats	M. Terczynski
63.65% (352/201)	YTD Win/Loss	43.18% (114/150)
60.44% (767/502)	Sets Win/Loss	45.35% (273/329)
54.57% (6451/5370)	Games Win/Loss	49.04% (2714/2820)
66.08% (113/58)	Hard Win/Loss	46.15% (42/49)
61.11% (154/98)	Clay Win/Loss	45.99% (63/74)
65.38% (85/45)	Indoor Hard W/L	27.27% (9/24)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/3)
0.2	Aces Per Game	0.11
1139	Aces Total	307
0.15	Double Faults Per Game	0.13
887	Total Double Faults	348
1:18:55	Average Match Time	1st Match
559.62	Average Opponent Rank	360.05
69% (19517/28466)	1st Serve %	63% (5191/8204)
68% (13201/19517)	1st Serve Win %	63% (3290/5191)
52% (4639/8949)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (1436/3013)
46% (1323/2869)	Break Points Won % (Total)	39% (257/654)
41% (11509/28052)	Return Points Win %	37% (2863/7767)
0% (0/0)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/1)
40.00% (26/39)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/5)
66.80% (326/162)	Futures W/L	44.19% (114/144)
64% (343/540)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	43% (112/262)
40% (2/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
51% (86/169)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	46% (24/52)
60% (99/166)	Deciding Set Win %	36% (27/75)
89% (339/301)	1st Set Won, Won Match	79% (128/101)
11% (339/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	21% (128/27)
24% (214/51)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	9% (136/12)